Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#323684 - 02/28/05 10:21 PM GFE question
wavewatcher Offline
Diamond Poster
wavewatcher
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,053
Hawaii
If we choose to "inflate" a GFE item to cover the cost of the most expense vendor (title costs vary depending on the vendor and the number of properties), would we have to disclose again if the costs are less than the disclosed amount? For instance our title insurance could cost between $100 - $400, we disclose $400. Later when the title company is selected, the $100 title insurance company is selected. Do we have to send another GFE to the customer to let them know that costs went down?

I'm asking because the real estate section wants to default all GFE charges and we will probably be over disclosing the amount of charges.

Return to Top
Lending Compliance
#323685 - 02/28/05 10:24 PM Re: GFE question
someone else Offline
Power Poster
someone else
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,300
back to my roots
It was my understanding that the tolerance for disclosed fees applies to both under-disclosing and over-disclosing. I would think once you found out what your fees are, you should re-disclose properly.

But you may want to wait for a guru to answer...
_________________________
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. - Carl Sagan

Return to Top
#323686 - 02/28/05 10:32 PM Re: GFE question
Love those Regs Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 297
Southern State
I don't believe you have to rework a GFE - it's an estimate just like the title says. There is no specific dollar amount or % that the GFE has to be in relation to the HUD-1 settlement statement either. I think you'd have an issue if you consistently underestimated on the GFE - do you own comparisions periodically and adjust your GFE as necessary to be as close as possible to the HUD-1 as you can reasonably get.
_________________________
Opinions are mine and subject to change frequently

Return to Top
#323687 - 02/28/05 10:53 PM Re: GFE question
E.E.G.B Offline
Power Poster
E.E.G.B
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,726
the sandy shore
Yes, exactly. That's why they let you do ranges - so that you can cover the most common fees. Now where you might have an issue is if someone could make a case that you consistently over-estimated to a protected class (ie, to discourage applications), but if you take the high estimate and consistently, across the board come in at that price or lower, it shouldn't be a problem. But you do need to look at it periodically and get a realistic number - you can't just arbitrarily assign a high dollar figure to cover any possibility, it has to at least be based in factual data.
_________________________
I disbelieved what he was saying so hard, I probably created an alternate universe where it wasn't true.

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z