This is from SAR Review #8:
For situations where the nature of the activity reported changes after the original Suspicious Activity Report filing, the suspicious activity is no longer considered “ongoing”--e.g., the customer in the above example begins sending or receiving funds in addition to making structured withdrawals. In such cases, the institution should consider the changed activity a new transaction and should file a new Suspicious Activity Report within the normal filing deadlines, rather than updating a previous filing after 90 days. Because the
activity is related, however, it may be appropriate to cross-reference any previously filed Suspicious Activity Reports in the narrative.
Not exactly the same situation, but very similar.
_________________________
Politicians are like diapers. They need to be changed often and for the same reason.